Home › The Clearview Guide › Part Three › Chapter 12
Part Three · The Building · Chapter 12 of 25

Maintenance Planning

Planning ahead, so there are no surprise levies

Small issues dealt with early, before they become large costs.

Waiting for something to break is the most expensive way to run a building. Clearview uses the engineering report to build a long term care plan, so the building stays in excellent condition and the money it needs is set aside in good time.

A plan built from the report

A maintenance schedule.

Pumps, pipes and plant serviced on a set schedule, before they fail.

Permanent solutions.

Each repair fixes the cause, so the same problem does not return a year later.

Evidence on file.

Before and after photographs of every job, kept in the portal.

A sinking fund that keeps pace.

The forecast is matched to the 10-year plan, so major works are funded when they fall due.

When it is left too late: an example

This is an illustrative scenario, not a Clearview client. All figures are illustrative.

A typical scheme’s waterproofing membranes reached the end of their life at around fifteen years. Rust stains and small cracks appeared on the balconies. Instead of investigating, the committee had the stains painted over for $3,800.

Over the next three years, water reached the steel reinforcement. As it corroded it expanded, cracking the concrete from inside. What would have been a $40,000 reseal became a $250,000 structural repair, more than six times the cost, with a $60,000 special levy the sinking fund could not cover.

A Condition Visit in the first year would have found the worn membrane and recommended the reseal. The whole problem would have been solved at the start.

The lesson

Early signs are the cheapest problems a building will ever have. A plan that finds them, and a sinking fund that is ready for them, protects every owner from a levy they never saw coming.

See how a long term plan would look for your building.

Ask for a free evaluation

Free, and with no obligation.

Free Scheme Evaluation